Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, January 2005

Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population

  • Michael D. Lara, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Matthew T. Baker, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Christopher J. Larson, PA-C, R.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Michelle A. Mathiason, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Pamela J. Lambert, R.N.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
  • ,
  • Shanu N. Kothari, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Shanu N. Kothari, MD, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, 1900 South Avenue, C05-001, La Crosse, WI 54601

Abstract 

Background

There is no consensus regarding the optimal rate of follow-up in the post-bariatric surgery patient population.

Methods

The records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from 2001 to 2003 were reviewed. Using patient zip codes, travel distances were calculated between the patients’ places of residence and our clinic. Patients were then assigned to 1 of 3 cohorts according to the following distances: (1) < 50 miles, (2) 50 to 100 miles, and (3) > 100 miles. Patient compliance with follow-up appointments at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months was analyzed. Linear trends were identified using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Age and sex were analyzed as possible predictors of compliance using the χ2 test. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The study group comprised 150 patients (127 females and 23 males). The 3 cohorts contained 115, 21, and 14 patients, respectively. All patients in each cohort were compliant with the 3-week follow-up appointment. Although there were differences in compliance between cohorts at each of the remaining appointments, only the 9-month (70.3% vs 61.9% vs 35.7%) visit showed statistical significance (P = .035). The 6-month visit trended toward significance (85.2% vs 76.2% vs 64.3%; P = .088). Males were more likely to be compliant with the 12-month follow-up (P = .040). When controlling for sex, travel distance was also a predictor of compliance at this follow-up visit (P = .024). Age was not predictive of compliance (P = .827).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, we conclude that travel distance from the clinic does not significantly affect compliance at the initial follow-up, 3-month, and 12-month appointments. However, distance does tend to affect compliance at the 6-month appointment and significantly affects compliance at the 9-month appointment. Males are more likely to be compliant at the 12 month follow-up visit. We must continue to strive for 100% follow-up in our post-bariatric surgery patients.

Keywords:  Morbid obesity , Bariatric surgery , Gastric bypass , Follow-up studies , Patient compliance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the R. James Trane Surgical Research and Data Center of the Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation, and the United States Surgical Corporation.

PII: S1550-7289(04)00002-4

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2004.11.001

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 17-21, January 2005