Journal Home
Search for

Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 56-58 (January 2005)


View previous. 15 of 25 View next.

Adverse psychosocial consequences of extreme obesity and the effects of surgically induced weight loss

Thomas A. Wadden, Ph.D.a

Article Outline

Adverse psychosocial consequences of extreme obesity

Improved psychosocial functioning after bariatric surgery

Summary

References

Copyright

I appreciate the opportunity to discuss a highly prevalent but frequently overlooked complication of extreme obesity—emotional suffering. After briefly discussing the adverse psychosocial consequences of obesity, I review the marked improvements in functioning that occur with surgically induced weight loss.

Adverse psychosocial consequences of extreme obesity 

return to Article Outline

Mood. Extreme obesity is associated with significantly increased mortality, principally from cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and several cancers [1], [2]. Although less well known, this condition also is associated with a marked increase in the risk of depression [3], [4]. A recent population study found that persons with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 were five times more likely than individuals of average weight to have experienced an episode of major depression in the past year [4]. Among persons who seek bariatric surgery, approximately 50% have a history of depression or other affective disturbance [5], [6], [7]. Patients frequently seek weight reduction to alleviate their emotional distress.

Eating disorders. Eating disorders also are common in bariatric surgery patients. Approximately 25% suffer from binge eating disorder (BED), which is characterized by the consumption of an objectively large amount of food in a brief period (< 2 hours), during which the individual experiences subjective loss of control [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Binge episodes cause significant emotional distress. But they are not followed by purging (eg, vomiting), which distinguishes BED from bulimia nervosa. The rate of BED in the general population is only 2% [11].

Quality of life. If not associated with frank psychiatric illness, extreme obesity is almost universally associated with decreased health-related quality of life (HRQL). HRQL refers to the burden of suffering and the limitations in vocational and social functioning associated with illness [12]. Numerous population and clinical studies have shown that compared with average weight individuals, extremely obese persons report significantly greater bodily pain, decreased vitality, and significant impairments in physical functioning, work, and social interactions [13], [14], [15].

But even quality of life scales cannot adequately measure the adverse emotional effects of the prejudice and discrimination to which extremely obese individuals are subjected daily [16]. Disparagement of obese individuals has been described as the “last socially acceptable form of prejudice” [17]. Overweight individuals are routinely labeled, even by health care professionals, as “weak-willed, awkward, ugly, and sloppy” [18]. Sadly, such ridicule engenders negative body image and feelings of inferiority in many obese individuals [6], [7]. Studies also have documented that obesity is associated with adverse economic and social consequences, particularly in women [19], [20]. For many, extreme obesity carries an enormous emotional burden that far exceeds that associated with physical illness.

Improved psychosocial functioning after bariatric surgery 

return to Article Outline

Quality of the evidence. Research on the psychosocial consequences of bariatric surgery has increased substantially over the past decade and has shown that weight loss is associated with lasting improvements in mood, eating disorders, and quality of life [5], [6], [7]. It is too early to tell whether one form of surgery, such as gastric bypass or laparoscopic adjustable banding, is superior to another in improving symptoms of depression or binge eating. Evidence suggests that long-term improvements are associated with the magnitude and stability of weight loss. Similarly, there are not adequate data to state definitively whether psychosocial status improves comparably in older and younger patients, although clinical impressions suggest no age-related differences. Finally, randomized controlled trials, which include a no-treatment condition, have not been conducted in this area. However, the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study included a carefully matched control group and revealed significantly greater improvements in psychosocial status in persons who lost weight with bariatric surgery [21].

The next sections briefly review changes in depression, eating disorders, and quality of life. The examination relies heavily on prior reviews [5], [6], [7] and includes the strongest data available. This includes the SOS study, as well as prospective, noncontrolled investigations that measure psychosocial status at regular intervals using structured clinical interviews or well-validated questionnaires.

Mood. In the SOS study, depression scores fell significantly more at 1 year in surgically treated patients than in control patients (40% vs 10% reduction, respectively). Similar improvements were observed in anxiety. At both 2- and 4-year follow-up evaluations, larger weight losses were associated with significantly greater improvements in both depression and anxiety [21], [22]. Mean weight loss at 2 years, which was induced primarily by vertical banded gastroplasty, was approximately 23% of initial weight.

Dixon et al [23] recently reported similar improvements in depression after a 20% reduction in initial weight achieved with laparoscopic adjustable banding. The mean presurgical score of 17.7 on the Beck Depression Inventory indicated moderate symptoms of depression. One year after surgery, this value fell to 7.8 and remained at 9.0 at a 3-year follow-up. These values indicate minimal symptoms of depression. Although weight loss achieved with diet and exercise is also associated with improvements in depression, these benefits are not maintained. Depression scores return to baseline levels as patients regain their lost weight, an all-too-common occurrence with behavioral interventions [24]. Numerous other investigations have demonstrated lasting reductions in both depression (and weight) with bariatric surgery [5], [6], [7].

Eating disorders. Several studies have shown that bariatric surgery is associated with nearly complete remission of BED [25], [26], [27], [28]. The small gastric pouch simply prevents patients from consuming an objectively large amount of food. In addition, surgery is associated with reductions in both hunger and disinhibition of appetite (ie, urges to overeat), as measured by the Eating Inventory [21], [29]. Although most investigations were uncontrolled, the SOS study found significantly greater improvements in surgically treated patients than in control patients over 2 years of observation [21].

Favorable changes in BED and appetite also have been reported in obese individuals treated by diet and exercise [30]. Once again, however, these improvements decay over time as patients regain lost body weight. A minority of surgically treated patients report feeling loss of control over their eating 2 or more years after surgery [31]. However, they still would appear to enjoy substantially greater long-term improvements in eating habits and appetite control than persons who receive traditional diet and exercise interventions.

Quality of life. Weight loss after bariatric surgery is associated with dramatic improvements in HRQL, as measured by the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) [32]. Nguyen et al [33], for example, found that patients who underwent gastric bypass, performed either laparoscopically or using an open technique, reported marked reductions in bodily pain, greater vitality, and improved general health and physical functioning. The patients’ scores were approximately 50% below national norms before surgery, but rose to these values only 3 months after surgery. In the first month, HRQL improved more rapidly in patients who underwent laparoscopic (rather than open) procedures, but the two groups showed equivalent improvements at 3 months. Other investigators have reported similar changes in HRQL [5], [6], [7] and observed that greater weight loss is associated with greater improvements [34].

Surgically treated patients in the SOS study also reported significantly greater improvements in HRQL than did control individuals [21]. Many improvements concerned patients’ greater comfort in social interactions in which their weight had previously inhibited them. Thus, after weight loss, surgically treated patients were significantly less troubled by events such as going to the movies, shopping for clothes, or being seen in a bathing suit. Even more eloquent testimony of improved HRQL after bariatric surgery is provided by patients studied by Rand and Macgregor [35]. Persons who had lost 45 kg or more and kept it off for 3 years or more reported that they would rather be normal weight, yet have a major handicap (eg, blindness, leg amputation, severe acne), than be morbidly obese again.

Summary 

return to Article Outline

This review has shown that extreme obesity is associated with significant psychiatric morbidity and impaired HRQL that in many cases imposes a greater burden of suffering than the physical complications of obesity. Research on this topic is in its infancy but is improving rapidly. Initial findings leave little doubt that the sustained weight loss resulting from bariatric surgery is associated with marked and sustained improvements in psychiatric status and HRQL.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1] Allison DB , Fontaine KR , Manson JE , et al.   Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States . JAMA . 1999;282:1530–1538 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[2]. [2] Calle EE , Rodriguez C , Walker-Thurmond K , et al.   Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of US adults . N Engl J Med . 2003;348:1625–1638 . CrossRef

[3]. [3] Carpenter KM , Hasin DS , Allison DB , et al.   Relationships between obesity and DSM-IV major depressive disorder, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts (results from a general population study) . Am J Public Health . 2000;90:251–257 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[4]. [4] Onyike  , C.U.  , Crum RM , Lee HB , et al.   Is obesity associated with major depression? Results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey . Am J Epidemiol . 2003;158:1139–1147 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[5]. [5] Herpertz S , Kielmann R , Wolf AM , et al.   Does obesity surgery improve psychosocial functioning? . A systematic review. Int J Obes . 2003;27:1300–1314 .

[6]. [6] Wadden TA , Sarwer DB , Womble LG , et al.   Psychosocial aspects of obesity and obesity surgery . Surg Clin North Am . 2001;81:1001–1024 . Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1680 KB) | CrossRef

[7]. [7] Sarwer, DB, Wadden TA, Fabricatore AF. Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of bariatric surgery. Obes Res, in press.

[8]. [8] Kalarchian MA , Wilson GT , Brolin RE , et al.   Binge eating in bariatric surgery patients . Int J Eat Disord . 1998;23:89–92 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[9]. [9] Hsu LKG , Mulliken B , McDonagh B , et al.   Binge eating disorder in extreme obesity . Int J Obes . 2002;26:1398–1403 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[10]. [10] de Zwaan M , Mitchell JE , Howell LM , et al.   Characteristics of morbidly obese patients before gastric bypass surgery . Compr Psychiatry . 2003;44:428–434 . | CrossRef

[11]. [11] Spitzer RL , Devlin M , Walsh TB , et al.   Binge eating disorder (a multisite field trial of the diagnostic criteria) . Int J Eat Disord . 1992;11:191–203 . CrossRef

[12]. [12] Wadden TA , Phelan S . Assessment of quality of life in obese individuals . Obes Res . 2002;10(Suppl):50S–57S .

[13]. [13] Fontaine KB , Cheskin LJ , Barofsky I . Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking treatment . J Fam Pract . 1996;43:265–270 . MEDLINE

[14]. [14] Larsson U , Karlsson J , Sullivan M . Impact of overweight and obesity on health-related quality of life (a Swedish population study) . Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord . 2002;26:417–424 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[15]. [15] Lean MEJ , Han TS , Seidell JC . Impairment of health and quality of life using new US federal guidelines for the identification of obesity . Arch Intern Med . 1999;159:837–843 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[16]. [16] Puhl R , Brownell KD . Bias, discrimination, and obesity . Obes Res . 2001;9:788–805 . MEDLINE

[17]. [17] Sobal J , Stunkard AJ . Socioeconomic status and obesity (a review of the literature) . Psychol Bull . 1989;105:260–275 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18] Foster GD , Wadden TA , Makris AP , et al.   Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment . Obes Res . 2003;11:1168–1177 . MEDLINE

[19]. [19] Roehling MV . Weight-based discrimination in employment (psychological and legal aspects) . Person Psychol . 1999;52:969–1016 .

[20]. [20] Gortmaker SL , Must A , Perrin JM , et al.   Social and economic consequences of overweight in adolescence and young adulthood . N Engl J Med . 1993;329:1008–1112 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[21]. [21] Karlsson J , Sjöstrom L , Sullivan M . Swedish obese subjects (SOS), an intervention study of obesity (two-year follow-up of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and eating behavior after gastric surgery for severe obesity) . Int J Obes . 1998;22:113–126 . MEDLINE

[22]. [22] Sullivan M , Karlsson J , Sjöstrom L , et al.   Why quality of life measures should be used in the treatment of patients with obesity . In:  Bjorntrop P editors. International textbook of obesity . London: Wiley; 2001; .

[23]. [23] Dixon JB , Dixon ME , O’Brien PE . Depression in association with severe obesity . Arch Intern Med . 2003;163:2058–2065 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[24]. [24] Wadden TA , Stunkard AJ , Liebschutz J . Three year follow-up of the treatment of obesity by very-low-calorie diet, behavior therapy, and their combination . J Consult Clin Psychol . 1988;56:925–928 . CrossRef

[25]. [25] Hsu LKG , Betancourt S , Sullivan SP . Eating disturbances before and after vertical banded gastroplasty (a pilot study) . Int J Eat Disord . 1996;19:23–34 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[26]. [26] Hsu LKG , Betancourt S , Sullivan SP . Eating disturbances and outcome of gastric bypass surgery (a pilot study) . Int J Eat Disord . 1997;21:385–390 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[27]. [27] Powers PS , Perez A , Boyd F , et al.   Eating pathology before and after bariatric surgery (a prospective study) . Int J Eat Disord . 1999;25:293–300 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[28]. [28] Kalarchian MA , Wilson GT , Brolin RE , et al.   Effects of bariatric surgery on binge eating and related psychopathology . Eat Weight Disord . 1999;4:15–23 . MEDLINE

[29]. [29] Lang T , Hauser R , Buddeberg C , et al.   Impact of gastric banding on eating behavior and weight . Obes Surg . 2002;12:100–107 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[30]. [30] Foster GD , Wadden TA , Kendall PC , et al.   Psychological effects of weight loss and regain (A prospective evaluation) . J Consult Clin Psychol . 1996;64:752–757 . CrossRef

[31]. [31] Kalarchian MA , Marcus MD , Wilson GT , et al.   Binge eating among gastric bypass patients at long-term follow-up . Obes Surg . 2002;12:270–275 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[32]. [32] Ware JE , Sherbourne CD . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) (I: conceptual framework and item selection) . Med Care . 1992;30:473–483 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[33]. [33] Nguyen NT , Goldman C , Rosenquist CJ , et al.   Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass (a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs) . Ann Surg . 2001;234:279–291 . MEDLINE | CrossRef

[34]. [34] Mathus-Vliegen EM , de Weerd S , de Wit LT . Health-related quality of life in patients with morbid obesity after gastric banding for surgically induced weight loss . Surgery . 2004;135:489–497 . Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (123 KB) | CrossRef

[35]. [35] Rand CS , Macgregor AM . Successful weight loss following obesity surgery and the perceived liability of morbid obesity . Int J Obes . 1991;15:577–579 . MEDLINE

a Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

PII: S1550-7289(04)00021-8

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2004.12.019


View previous. 15 of 25 View next.