Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 4, Issue 6 , Pages 729-734, November 2008

Comparison of permanent and nonpermanent staple line buttressing materials for linear gastric staple lines during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Scott A. Shikora, M.D., F.A.C.S.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Scott A. Shikora, M.D., F.A.C.S., Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box 900, Boston, MA 02111
  • ,
  • Julie J. Kim, M.D., F.A.C.S.
  • ,
  • Michael E. Tarnoff, M.D., F.A.C.S.

Division of Bariatric Surgery, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Received 27 November 2007; received in revised form 5 February 2008; accepted 7 February 2008. published online 01 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Several publications have suggested that staple line buttressing might decrease staple line bleeding, increase burst pressure, and decrease the likelihood of acute failure resulting in leak. Currently, permanent and nonpermanent options are available. However, concern has been raised about the permanent buttress material and its potential for delayed strip expulsion. This study analyzed our experience with 3 different buttressing materials for creating the gastric division during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Methods

From July 5, 2001 to May 30, 2007, 1451 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass with buttressing material used for the stapled creation of the gastric pouch. Peristrips Dry (PSDs), permanent bovine pericardial strips, were used in 926 cases from July 5, 2001 to October 11, 2005. Seamguards, a synthetic bioabsorbable product, were used in 145 cases from November 2, 2004 to July 18, 2006, and PSD Veritas, remodelable, nonpermanent bovine pericardial strips, were placed in 380 patients from October 11, 2005 to May 30, 2007. All products were applied to the 60-mm-long, 3.5-mm cartridges of the EndoGIA II stapler. The ease of use, operative complications, visual bleeding, and postoperative leaks were recorded.

Results

The patient characteristics were comparable for all groups. All products were easy to load on the stapler, and no operative complications related to the use of the buttress materials occurred. The incidence and severity of staple line bleeding was not specifically calculated but was visually noted to be minimal in all cases. Of the 3 groups, 4 contained leaks occurred in the Seamguards group, and all were successfully managed nonoperatively. No acute leaks were discovered in the PSD or PSD Veritas groups. This difference was statistically significant (p <.001).

Conclusion

Neither the PSDs or PSD Veritas group exhibited staple line complications. However, 4 leaks occurred in the patients who had Seamguards incorporated into their gastric pouch linear staple lines.

Keywords: Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Staple line failure, Staple line buttressing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1550-7289(08)00076-2

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2008.02.001

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 4, Issue 6 , Pages 729-734, November 2008