Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 361-366, July 2010

Physical activity and physical function changes in obese individuals after gastric bypass surgery

  • Deborah A. Josbeno, M.S., P.T.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • John M. Jakicic, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Andrea Hergenroeder, M.P.T.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • George M. Eid, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Received 12 May 2008; received in revised form 17 July 2008; accepted 5 August 2008. published online 15 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background

Little is known about the effects of gastric bypass surgery (GBS) on physical activity and physical function. We examined the physical activity, physical function, psychosocial correlates to physical activity participation, and health-related quality of life of patients before and after GBS.

Methods

A total of 20 patients were assessed before and 3 months after GBS. Physical activity was assessed using the 7-day physical activity recall questionnaire and a pedometer worn for 7 days. Physical function was assessed using the 6-minute walk test, Short Physical Performance Battery, and the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-36). The Physical Activity Self-Efficacy questionnaire, the Physical Activity Barriers and Outcome Expectations questionnaire, the SF-36, and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale were also administered.

Results

Physical activity did not significantly increase from before (191.1 ± 228.23 min/wk) to after (231.7 ± 230.04 min/wk) GBS (n = 18); however, the average daily steps did significantly increase (from 4621 ± 3701 to 7370 ± 4240 steps/d; n = 11). The scores for the 6-minute walk test (393 ± 62.08 m to 446 ± 41.39 m; n = 17), Short Physical Performance Battery (11.2 ± 1.22 to 11.7 ± .57; n = 18), physical function subscale of the SF-36 (65 ± 18.5 to 84.1 ± 19.9), and the total SF-36 (38.2 ± 23.58 to 89.7 ± 15.5; n = 17) increased significantly. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale score decreased significantly for low back (3.5 ± 1.8 to 1.7 ± 2.63), knee (2.4 ± 2.51 to 1.0 ± 1.43), and foot/ankle (2.3 ± 2.8 to 0.9 ± 2.05) pain. No significant changes were found in the Physical Activity Self-Efficacy questionnaire or the Physical Activity Barriers and Outcome Expectations questionnaire.

Conclusion

GBS improves physical function, health-related quality of life, and self-reported pain and results in a modest improvement in physical activity. These are important clinical benefits of surgical weight loss. Long-term follow-up is needed to quantify the ability to sustain or further improve these important clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Obesity, Bariatric surgery, Gastric bypass, Physical activity, Physical function

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Reprints not available from the authors.

PII: S1550-7289(08)00624-2

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.003

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 4 , Pages 361-366, July 2010