Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 455-458, July 2009
Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass: cohort study with 83% rate of 5-year follow-up
Abstract
Background
Silastic ring vertical gastric bypass (SRVGB) with jejunal interposition is our standard operation for morbidly obese patients. We present the results of 5 years of follow-up in a cohort of patients who underwent SRVGB in 2001.
Methods
The records of all 160 consecutive patients who underwent SRVGB from January to December 2001 were reviewed. Of the 160 procedures, 143 were primary open cases, 14 were revisions from restrictive procedures, and 3 were laparoscopic cases. At 5 years, the body mass index and percentage of excess weight loss was available for 133 patients (83%) at office visits (n = 91, 68.4%), by telephone (n = 40, 30.1%), or by e-mail (n = 2, 1.5%).
Results
Of the 160 patients, 121 were women and 39 were men, with a mean age of 33.15 ± 10.0 years, percentage of ideal body weight of 195.7% ± 40.8%, and body mass index of 44.6 ± 9.3 kg/m2. The mean hospital stay was 3 ± 1 days. One patient (.6%) died of a pulmonary embolus. Early complications included 3 cases (1.87%) of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 4 gastric leaks (2.5%): 2 (1.36%) from primary cases and 2 (14.29%) from revisional cases. Late complications included 32 patients (20%) with incisional hernias, 20 (12.5%) with anemia, 14 (8.8%) with dumping, 4 (2.5%) with gastrojejunal stricture, 2 (1.25%) with intestinal obstruction, and 2 (1.25%) requiring silastic ring surgical removal. The 5-year follow-up data were available for 133 patients (83%). The mean body mass index in this group was 27 ± 5 kg/m2, with a percentage of excess weight loss of 83% ± 18.3% at 5 years postoperatively.
Conclusion
The results of our study have shown that SRVGB is an effective operation for promoting lasting weight loss, with acceptable mortality and complication rates.
Keywords: Silastic ring, Gastric bypass, Obesity, Bariatric surgery
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Reprints not available from the authors.
PII: S1550-7289(08)00775-2
doi:10.1016/j.soard.2008.10.002
© 2009 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 5, Issue 4 , Pages 455-458, July 2009

