Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 2 , Pages 146-151, 4 March 2010

Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty

Accepted for presentation at the Plenary Session of the 26th American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeons Annual Meeting, Grapevine, Texas.

Bariatric Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universita' di Padova, Padova, Italy

Received 21 May 2009; received in revised form 3 August 2009; accepted 4 September 2009. published online 16 September 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is considered an effective multipurpose operation for morbid obesity, although long-term results are still lacking. Also, the best procedure to be offered in the case of failed restrictive procedures is still debated. We here reported our results of LSG as a revisional procedure for inadequate weight loss and/or complications after adjustable gastric banding or gastroplasty.

Methods

Since April 2005, 57 patients (20 men and 37 women), with a mean age of 49.9 ± 11.9 years, underwent revisional LSG, 52 after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding/adjustable gastric banding and 5 after vertical banded gastroplasty at our institution. The mean interval from the primary procedure to LSG was 7.54 ± 4.8 years. The LSG was created using a 34F bougie with an endostapler, after removing the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band or the anterior portion of the band in those who had undergone vertical banded gastroplasty. An upper gastrointestinal contrast study was performed within 3 days after surgery and, if the findings were negative, a soft diet was promptly started.

Results

A total of 41 patients had undergone concurrent band removal and LSG and 16 had undergone band removal followed by an interval LSG. Three cases required conversion to open surgery because of a large incisional hernia. The mean operative time was 120 minutes (range 90–180). One patient died of multiple organ failure from septic shock. Three patients (5.7%) developed a perigastric hematoma, 3 (5.7%) had leaks, and 1 had mid-gastric short stenosis. The median hospital stay was 5 days. The mean body mass index at revisional LSG was 45.7 ± 10.8 kg/m2 and had decreased to 39 ± 8.5 kg/m2 after 2 years, with a mean percentage of the estimated excess body mass index lost of 41.6% ± 24.4%. Two patients required a duodenal switch for insufficient weight loss.

Conclusion

LSG seems to be effective as revisional procedure for failed LAGB/vertical banded gastroplasty, although with greater complication rates than the primary procedures. Larger series and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these promising results.

Keywords: Revisional bariatric surgery, Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, Band failure, Gastroplasty

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1550-7289(09)00626-1

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2009.09.003

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 2 , Pages 146-151, 4 March 2010