Journal Home
Search for

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 31-35 (January 2010)


View previous. 9 of 30 View next.

Adjustable gastric banding as revisional bariatric procedure after failed gastric bypass—intermediate results

Presented at the 2008 Plenary Session of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, June 15–20, 2008, Washington, DC

Marc Bessler, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Amna Daud, M.D., M.P.H., Mary F. DiGiorgi, M.P.H., William B. Inabnet, M.D., Beth Schrope, M.D., Ph.D., Lorraine Olivero-Rivera, F.N.P.C.S., Daniel Davis, D.O.

Received 2 June 2008; received in revised form 14 August 2009; accepted 28 September 2009. published online 12 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Although gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure in the United States, it is has been associated with a failure rate of 15% (range 5–40%). The addition of an adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been reported to be a useful revision strategy in a small series of patients with inadequate weight loss after proximal gastric bypass.

Methods

We report on 22 patients who presented with inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain after proximal gastric bypass. All patients underwent revision with the placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band around the proximal gastric pouch. The bands were adjusted at 6 weeks postoperatively and beyond, as needed. Complications and weight loss at the most recent follow-up visit were evaluated.

Results

The mean age and body mass index at revision was 41.27 years (range 25–58) and 44.8 ± 6.34 kg/m2, respectively. Patients had experienced a loss of 19%, 27%, 47.3%, 42.3%, 43%, and 47% of their excess weight at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after the revisional procedure, respectively. Three major complications occurred requiring reoperation. No band erosions have been documented.

Conclusion

The results from this larger series of patients have also indicated that the addition of the adjustable silicone gastric band causes significant weight loss in patients with poor weight loss outcomes after gastric bypass. That no anastomosis or change in absorption is required makes this an attractive revisional strategy. As with all revisional procedures, the complication rates appear to be increased compared with a similar primary operation.

Center for Obesity Surgery, Columbia University, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Marc Bessler, MD, Center for Obesity Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, 6th Floor, Room 620, New York, NY 10032

PII: S1550-7289(09)00695-9

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2009.09.018


View previous. 9 of 30 View next.