Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 274-281, May 2010

Psychological classification as a communication and management tool in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery

  • Robin P. Blackstone, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Scottsdale Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, Arizona
    • Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Robin P. Blackstone, M.D., F.A.C.S., Scottsdale Bariatric Center, 10200 North 92nd Street, Suite 225, Scottsdale, AZ 85258
  • ,
  • Melisa C. Cortes, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • Scottsdale Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, Arizona
  • ,
  • L. Buddy Messer, Psy.D.

      Affiliations

    • Scottsdale Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, Arizona
  • ,
  • David Engstrom, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Scottsdale Bariatric Center, Scottsdale, Arizona

Received 5 August 2009; received in revised form 11 December 2009; accepted 1 February 2010. published online 22 February 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Psychological evaluations are used to ascertain patient suitability for bariatric surgery and to challenge their ability to comply with therapy. The modern paradigm of obesity includes a neurobiologic component working in parallel with the limbic system of appetite and reward. To achieve the goals of surgery, an evaluation of the psychological fitness of the patient is often included in the clinical pathway. We present a psychological classification system with the goal of integrating the psychological factors into patient treatment.

Methods

All patients (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, n = 1814; laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, n = 589) were evaluated using psychological testing/interview and assigned to groups 1–4 before surgery. The group 1 patients (n = 788; 32.8%) did not necessitate intervention, group 2 (n = 1110; 46.2%) were requested to attend the support group, groups 3A (n = 394; 16.4%) and 3B (n = 111; 4.6%) required intervention to continue to surgery, and group 4 patients were not recommended for surgery. The main outcome measures, including complication, readmission, and reoperation rates, were analyzed for differences among the psychological groups.

Results

After comparing the outcome measures between each classification, no significant differences were found in the major complication rates, readmissions, reoperations, or length of stay among the groups. Groups 3A and 3B were able to achieve similar rates of success, despite their psychosocial impairment at the initial evaluation.

Conclusion

The assignment of a psychological classification can facilitate bariatric team recognition of the unique psychological factors that affect the success of surgery. Assessing the patient's psychological composition and addressing potential psychosocial barriers before surgery can increase the positive long-term outcomes and reduce the incidence of complications after bariatric surgery.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery, Medical psychology, Morbid obesity, Gastric bypass, Needs assessment, Outcome assessment, Healthcare, Risk assessment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1550-7289(10)00074-2

doi:10.1016/j.soard.2010.02.034

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 274-281, May 2010