In this issue of Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Carandina et al. [
[1]
] from University Hospital in France publish their study comparing outcomes and long-term
follow-up of patients receiving primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with those undergoing
conversion to SG after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). Follow-up
was at 3-month intervals for first 2 years, 6-month intervals for year 3, and annually
to year 6.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Surgery for Obesity and Related DiseasesAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
Carandina S, Genser L, Bossi M, Polliand C, Tabbara M, Barrat C. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric banding: is it really effective? Six years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017. pii: S1550-7289(17)30069-2
- Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed gastric banding: lessons from 300 consecutive cases.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014; 10: 1116-1122
- Revisional surgery after failed gastric banding: results of one-stage conversion to RYGB in 195 patients.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014; 10: 1077-1083
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 23, 2017
Identification
Copyright
© 2017 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after failed gastric banding: is it really effective? Six years of follow-upSurgery for Obesity and Related DiseasesVol. 13Issue 7
