Advertisement
Original article| Volume 18, ISSUE 6, P716-726, June 2022

Comparative effectiveness of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease 5 years after surgery

      Highlights

      • The Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass vs. Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease (ENGAGE CVD) study compared the effectiveness of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for reduction of the American College of Cardiology (ACA) and the American Heart Association (AHA) predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 5 years after surgery.
      • Patients (2,771 RYGB and 6,256 VSG) were primarily women (80.6%), Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black (63.7%), were 46±10 years old, with a BMI of 43.40±6.5 kg/m2. The predicted 10-year ASCVD risk at surgery was 4.1% for VSG and 5.1% for RYGB, decreasing to 2.6% for VSG and 2.8% for RYGB 1-year postoperatively. By 5 years after surgery, patients remained with relatively low risk levels (3.0% for VSG and 3.3% for RYGB) and there were no significant differences in predicted 10-year ASCVD risk between VSG and RYGB at any time.
      • For both operations, the prevalence of smoking began to increase immediately following surgery (p<.001). However, all other indicators used for the predicted 10-year ASCVD risk score significantly improved over time (p<.001).
      • Our findings suggest RYGB and VSG provide similar benefits for 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease. Literature reporting significant differences between VSG and RYGB in 10-year ASCVD risk may be a result of residual confounding.

      Abstract

      Background

      Comparative evidence is needed when deciding which bariatric operation to undergo for long-term cardiovascular risk reduction.

      Objectives

      The Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass vs. Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease (ENGAGE CVD) study compared the effectiveness of vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) operations for reduction of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association–predicted 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 5 years after surgery.

      Setting

      Data for this study came from a large integrated healthcare system in the Southern California region of the United States. This is one of the most ethnically diverse (64% non-White) bariatric populations in the literature.

      Methods

      The ENGAGE CVD cohort consisted of 22,095 patients who underwent VSG or RYGB from 2009–2016. The VSG and RYGB were compared using a local instrumental variable approach to address observed and unobserved confounding, as well as to conduct heterogeneity of treatment effects for patients of different age groups, baseline-predicted 10-year CVD risk using the ASCVD risk score, and those who had type 2 diabetes (T2D) at the time of surgery.

      Results

      Patients (2771 RYGB and 6256 VVSG) were primarily women (80.6%), Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black (63.7%), and 46 ± 10 years of age, with a body mass index of 43.40 ± 6.5 kg/m2. The predicted 10-year ASCVD risk at surgery was 4.1% for VSG and 5.1% for RYGB, decreasing to 2.6% for VSG and 2.8% for RYGB 1 year postoperatively. By 5 years after surgery, patients remained with relatively low risk levels (3.0% for VSG and 3.3% for RYGB) and there were no significant differences in predicted 10-year ASCVD risk between VSG and RYGB at any time.

      Conclusion

      Predicted 10-year ASCVD risk was low in this population and remained low up to 5 years for those with diabetes, Black and Hispanic patients, and older adults. Literature reporting significant differences between VSG and RYGB in 10-year ASCVD risk may be a result of residual confounding.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Courcoulas A.P.
        • Belle S.H.
        • Neiberg R.H.
        • et al.
        Three-year outcomes of bariatric surgery vs. lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment: a randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 931-940
        • Arterburn D.E.
        • Bogart A.
        • Coleman K.J.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of bariatric surgery vs nonsurgical treatment of type 2 diabetes among severely obese adults.
        Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013; 7: e258-e268
        • Coleman K.J.
        • Haneuse S.
        • Johnson E.
        • et al.
        Long-term microvascular disease outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: evidence for the legacy effect of surgery.
        Diabetes Care. 2016; 39: 1400-1407
        • Fisher D.P.
        • Johnson E.
        • Haneuse S.
        • et al.
        Association between bariatric surgery and macrovascular disease outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe obesity.
        JAMA. 2018; 320: 1570-1582
        • O’Brien R.
        • Johnson E.
        • Haneuse S.
        • et al.
        Microvascular outcomes in patients with diabetes after bariatric surgery versus usual care: a matched cohort study.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 300-310
        • Arterburn D.
        • Wellman R.
        • Emiliano A.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness and safety of bariatric procedures for weight loss: a PCORnet cohort study.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 741-750
        • Schauer P.R.
        • Bhatt D.L.
        • Kirwan J.P.
        • et al.
        Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 641-651
        • Arterburn D.
        • Schauer D.P.
        • Wise R.E.
        • et al.
        Change in predicted 10-year cardiovascular risk following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.
        Obes Surg. 2009; 19: 184-189
        • Batsis J.A.
        • Sarr M.G.
        • Collazo-Clavell M.L.
        • et al.
        Cardiovascular risk after bariatric surgery for obesity.
        Am J Cardiol. 2008; 102: 930-937
        • Oliveira S.C.
        • Neves J.S.
        • Souteiro P.
        • et al.
        Impact of bariatric surgery on long-term cardiovascular risk: comparative effectiveness of different surgical procedures.
        Obes Surg. 2020; 30: 673-680
        • Min T.
        • Prior S.L.
        • Caplin S.
        • Barry J.D.
        • Stephens J.W.
        Temporal effect of bariatric surgery on predicted 10-Year and lifetime cardiovascular risk at 1 month, 6 months, and 5 years following surgery: a pilot study.
        Met Syndr Relat Disord. 2017; 15: 130-136
        • Hemann B.A.
        • Bimson W.F.
        • Taylor A.J.
        The Framingham Risk Score: an appraisal of its benefits and limitations.
        Am Heart Hosp J. 2007; 5: 91-96
        • Goff D.C.
        • Lloyd-Jones D.M.
        • Bennett G.
        • et al.
        2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 2935-2959
        • Blanco D.G.
        • Funes D.R.
        • Giambartolomei G.
        • Lo Menzo E.
        • Szomstein S.
        • Rosenthal R.J.
        High cardiovascular risk patients benefit more from bariatric surgery than low cardiovascular risk patients.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 1626-1631
        • Raygor V.
        • Garcia L.
        • Maron D.J.
        • Morton J.M.
        The comparative effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on 10-year and lifetime atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.
        Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 3111-3117
        • Ponce J.
        • Nguyen N.T.
        • Hutter M.
        • Sudan R.
        • Morton J.M.
        American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in the United States, 2011–2014.
        Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11: 1199-1200
        • Coleman K.J.
        • Fischer H.
        • Arterburn D.E.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of gastric bypass vs. gastric sleeve for cardiovascular disease (ENGAGE CVD): a comparative effectiveness study of gastric bypass and gastric sleeve for cardiovascular disease risk.
        JMIR Res Protoc. 2020; 9e14936
      1. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) [homepage on the Internet]. Newberry, FL: The Society; [cited 2019 Oct 23]. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) [about 1 screen].
        (Available from:)
        • Coleman K.J.
        • Huang Y.C.
        • Hendee F.
        • Watson H.L.
        • Casillas R.A.
        • Brookey J.
        Three-year weight outcomes from a bariatric surgery registry in a large integrated healthcare system.
        Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014; 10: 396-403
        • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders
        Potential candidates for weight-loss surgery: who is a good adult candidate for bariatric surgery? National Institutes of Health [serial on the Internet]. 2020 Sep [cited 2019 Oct 1];[about 4 screens].
        (Available from:)
        • Hinerman A.S.
        • Barinas-Mitchell E.J.M.
        • El Khoudary S.R.
        • Courcoulas A.P.
        • Wahed A.S.
        • King W.C.
        Change in predicted 10-year and lifetime cardiovascular disease risk after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
        Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16: 1011-1021
        • Matlock D.D.
        • Groeneveld P.W.
        • Sidney S.
        • et al.
        Geographic variation in cardiovascular procedure use among Medicare fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.
        JAMA. 2013; 310: 155-162
        • Sidney S.
        • Cheetham T.C.
        • Connell F.A.
        • et al.
        Recent combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and the risk of thromboembolism and other cardiovascular events in new users.
        Contraception. 2013; 87: 93-100
        • Angrist J.
        • Imbens G.
        • Rubin D.
        Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.
        J Amer Stat Assoc. 1996; 91: 444-455
        • Kent D.M.
        • Steyerberg E.
        • van Klaveren D.
        Personalized evidence-based medicine: Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.
        BMJ. 2018; 363: k4245
        • Basu A.
        • Heckman J.
        • Navarro-Lozano S.
        • Urzua S.
        Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: an application to treatments of breast cancer patients.
        Health Econ. 2007; 16: 1133-1157
        • Basu A.
        Estimating person-centered treatment (PeT) effects using instrumental variables: an Application to evaluating prostate cancer treatments.
        J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl). 2014; 29: 671-691
        • Basu A.
        • Gore J.L.
        Are elderly patients with clinically localized prostate cancer overtreated? Exploring heterogeneity in survival effects.
        Med Care. 2015; 53: 79-86
        • Grieve R.
        • O’Neill S.
        • Basu A.
        • Keele L.
        • Rowan K.M.
        • Harris S.
        Analysis of benefit of intensive care unit transfer for deteriorating ward patients: a patient-centered approach to clinical evaluation.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2e187704
        • Basu A.
        • Jones A.M.
        • Dias P.R.
        Heterogeneity in the impact of type of schooling on adult health and lifestyle.
        J Health Econ. 2018; 57: 1-14
        • Papke L.E.
        • Wooldridge J.M.
        Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates.
        J Econometrics. 2008; 145: 121-133
        • Arps K.
        • Blumenthal R.S.
        • Martin S.S.
        New aspects of the risk assessment guidelines: practical highlights, scientific evidence, and future goals. American College of Cardiology [serial on the Internet]. 2018 Nov [cited 2021 Feb 3];[about 11 screens].
        (Available from:)
        • Basu A.
        • Manca A.
        Regression estimators for generic health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years.
        Med Decis Making. 2012; 32: 56-69
        • Sim J.J.
        • Handler J.
        • Jacobsen S.J.
        • Kanter M.H.
        Systemic implementation strategies to improve hypertension: the Kaiser Permanente Southern California experience.
        Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30: 544-552
        • Harrison T.N.
        • Scott R.D.
        • Cheetham T.C.
        • et al.
        Trends in statin use 2009-2015 in a large integrated health system: pre- and post-2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on Treatment of Blood Cholesterol.
        Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018; 32: 397-404
        • Wolvers P.J.D.
        • Bruin S.C.
        • Mairuhu W.M.
        • et al.
        Self-reported smoking compared to serum cotinine in bariatric surgery patients: smoking is underreported before the operation.
        Obes Surg. 2020; 30: 23-37
        • Adams C.E.
        • Gabriele J.M.
        • Baillie L.E.
        • Dubbert P.M.
        Tobacco use and substance use disorders as predictors of postoperative weight loss 2 years after bariatric surgery.
        J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012; 39: 462-471
        • King W.C.
        • Chen J.
        • Mitchell J.E.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of alcohol use disorders before and after bariatric surgery.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 2516-2525
        • Peterhansel C.
        • Petroff D.
        • Klinitzke G.
        • Kersting A.
        • Wagner B.
        Risk of completed suicide after bariatric surgery: a systematic review.
        Obesity Rev. 2013; 14: 369-382
        • Marino J.M.
        • Ertelt T.W.
        • Lancaster K.
        • et al.
        The emergence of eating pathology after bariatric surgery: a rare outcome with important clinical implications.
        Int J Eating Disord. 2012; 45: 179-184
        • Campbell S.C.
        • Moffatt R.J.
        • Stamford B.A.
        Smoking and smoking cessation – the relationship between cardiovascular disease and lipoprotein metabolism: a review.
        Atherosclerosis. 2008; 201: 225-235
        • Mechanick J.I.
        • Apovian C.
        • Brethauer S.
        • et al.
        Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, the Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists - Executive Summary.
        Endocr Pract. 2019; 25: 1346-1359
        • Saltzman E.
        • Anderson W.
        • Apovian C.M.
        • et al.
        Criteria for patient selection and multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment of the weight loss surgery patient.
        Obes Res. 2005; 13: 234-243
        • Nijamkin M.P.
        • Campa A.
        • Sosa J.
        • Baum M.
        • Himburg S.
        • Johnson P.
        Comprehensive nutrition and lifestyle education improves weight loss and physical activity in Hispanic Americans following gastric bypass surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 382-390

      Linked Article